Sep 20 2007
the way we were
It’s time to come clean. I have to admit that I have been a skeptic of distance learning for years. It all goes back to my TV Spanish course back in the sixth grade I think. It was such a failure in my eyes that still years later I was never able to see distance learning as a viable format for education—-until now, that is…but more about THAT later!! These days I ask myself what it was in that experience that disappointed me so much and even made me feel resentful.
Now I figured it out. The answer lies in the most central ingredient of the program: i.e. the ?”TV?” part of TV Spanish. The television is an apparatus that transmits information entirely in one direction. It’s no wonder we sixth graders were not amused. In the new setting we had an even more diminished role in “learning.” What little influence we had enjoyed in the regular classroom was now completely taken away . Whereas before we could at least provide feedback to the teacher—through our puzzled looks or our glazed-over, sleepy eyes—we now were utterly powerless. This new, electronic instructor took no note of our well being and plowed on through the lesson.
What could we do?
We rebelled of course and in the end had our revenge. TV Spanish died a disgraceful death and soon vanished into oblivion. Or did it? I don’t even remember…I was too busy growing up. It doesn’t matter anymore.
In the end though the creators of TV Spanish for sixth graders should not be blamed for the failure of their project. They were merely complying with the general assumptions in education at the time which have persisted for decades in schools. Like everyone else they were made gullible and blind by a very persuasive metaphor: that learning is simply a matter of filling vessels with knowledge. If it were so, television would undoubtedly be hard to beat as a classroom tool. Is anything better at disseminating information (and misinformation?) The internet comes close.
Perhaps the lesson of TV Spanish is that distance learning is especially ill suited to rely on a one-way, stand-and-deliver format upon which to base instruction since there is no on-site teacher to intervene and gauge the student responses. If DL is to become a viable alternative to classroom instruction then it must offer something more.
